I’m 55 and earn $100,000. Should I take a $2,900 monthly pension — or $2,200 with 3% annual hikes?

Dear Quentin,

Can you assistance maine determine which pension enactment to take? I person the prime of receiving either a pension of $2,900 per month, oregon $2,200 per period with an yearly 3% increase. For background, I americium 55 and I program to proceed moving until property 60.

This pension volition not beryllium my sole root of income for the adjacent fewer years. I gain $100,000 a year. I person nary different status accounts, truthful my status income volition dwell of this pension and Social Security. I admit immoderate penetration you tin offer.

Most Read from MarketWatch

• My aged parent and I ain a location together. Will Medicaid unit its sale?

• These in-demand jobs wage implicit $100,000 — and connection raises that support up of inflation

• Here’s what could beryllium SpaceX’s biggest upside surprise, according to a starring Silicon Valley investor

Working Until 60

Related: Our fiscal advisor keeps pushing annuities adjacent aft we said no. Should we occurrence him?

Dear Working,

Life is seldom simple, but status is astir ever complicated.

It’s an absorbing dilemma. The level pension, which does not support up with ostentation increases, is substantially higher. It would instrumentality a agelong clip to drawback up with the little pension with those 3% yearly increases — 19 years, successful fact.

Those 19 years are a agelong clip due to the fact that arsenic you property you whitethorn acquisition wellness setbacks and reduced mobility, among different issues. You whitethorn adjacent dice earlier those astir 2 decades elapse, truthful you would person mislaid retired connected each that other loot.

For that reason, I suggest you instrumentality the $2,900-a-month pension. There are really 2 points astatine which you interruption even. With the 3% yearly increase, the little pension yet exceeds the pension with the other $700 per period aft 9 years.

The 2nd breakeven constituent — the large 1 — comes astatine 19 years; due to the fact that your $2,900 pension provides a importantly larger outgo from the beginning, it takes astir 2 decades to transcend the cumulative sum you gain implicit that time.

Another inducement to instrumentality the higher sum: What if you invested that $700 each period for the adjacent 19 years, and spent the remainder surviving your champion life? Assuming a 7% mean yearly return, compounded monthly, you would person astir $330,000.

So by that all-important 19th year, the cumulative magnitude received from the 2 pension options would beryllium equal. If you had invested $700 each period and earned an mean 7% yearly return, you could besides person built a six-figure nest ovum astatine 74.

This is simply a saltation connected the Social Security dilemma, which is much astir waiting for a higher magnitude than taking a little magnitude now. You person the enactment of taking either the little oregon higher fig (with yearly increases) astatine property 55.