The Hidden Tax of Fragility: Why Low Durability is a Supply Chain Liability

In sourcing meetings, the speech astir ever gravitates toward 2 metrics: landed outgo and velocity to market. It is simply a look that has dominated the manufacture for decades. If we tin shave cents disconnected the portion terms and get it connected the support successful six weeks, the spreadsheet looks green, and the occupation is considered done.

But for those of america managing the abstraction betwixt plan and delivery, the world is acold messier. The manufacture has spent years optimizing for the transaction, the infinitesimal erstwhile goods alteration hands, portion mostly ignoring the operational friction that occurs earlier and after. We person built systems designed to determination precocious volumes of low-durability products, assuming that “cheap and fast” is the astir businesslike model.

More from Sourcing Journal

• A Look Ahead: Reaping the Supply Chain Lessons of 2025

• Have Supply Chain Scandals successful Luxury Reached a Tipping Point?

• Geopolitics Set to Shake Up Sourcing-Again-in 2026

That presumption is becoming expensive. Low-durability sourcing isn’t conscionable a prime issue; it is simply a hidden taxation connected operations. When brands prioritize bottom-dollar portion costs implicit longevity, they aren’t redeeming money. They are simply deferring the cost, spreading it crossed logistics, lawsuit service, warehousing, and the sourcing teams near cleaning up the messiness of planned obsolescence.

The astir contiguous operational outgo of debased durability is the workload it creates. A merchandise that fails aboriginal creates a ripple effect that travels backward up the proviso chain.

Low durability forces sourcing teams to negociate nonaccomplishment alternatively than flow. Every defective portion oregon premature wear-out triggers a bid of unplanned tasks: issuing replacement acquisition orders, revisiting tech packs and specifications, coordinating expedited freight, and handling the interior approvals required to close gaps successful inventory.

Brands often underestimate this overhead. There is simply a tangible outgo to managing the complexity of fixing atrocious products. When you root for durability, you are efficaciously buying stability. You are reducing the frantic cadence of replacing inventory that should person remained sellable.

Beyond the administrative workload, determination is simply a strategical mistake successful however we presumption volume. Churn is often rationalized with a acquainted assumption: that if a merchandise wears retired quickly, the lawsuit volition simply travel backmost for different unit, driving up income volume.

From a supply-chain perspective, this is simply a “fragile bet.” It assumes that replacement request behaves similar steadfast replenishment demand. In reality, merchandise nonaccomplishment is much apt to interruption the request awesome entirely. In a saturated market, mediocre durability seldom triggers a reorder; it triggers a switch.