Growth-Oriented ETFs: VONG Has Lower Fees, While IWY Has Delivered Higher Returns

• VONG offers a little disbursal ratio and broader diversification than IWY

• IWY has a heavier tilt toward exertion and a much concentrated portfolio

• Both funds delivered astir identical 1-year full returns and yields arsenic of Jan. 9, 2026

• These 10 stocks could mint the adjacent question of millionaires ›

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (NASDAQ:VONG) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:IWY) some absorption connected large-cap U.S. maturation stocks, but VONG charges little fees and holds a broader swath of companies, portion IWY leans much heavy into the exertion assemblage with a much concentrated portfolio.

Both VONG and IWY purpose to seizure the show of large-cap U.S. maturation companies, appealing to investors seeking semipermanent superior appreciation from marketplace leaders. This examination looks astatine cost, diversification, assemblage exposure, risk, and caller returns to assistance clarify which ETF whitethorn entreaty much for a peculiar portfolio.

Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year play returns. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.

VONG looks much affordable with a 0.07% disbursal ratio, undercutting IWY's 0.20% fee. VONG besides offers a somewhat higher dividend output of 0.5% versus 0.4% for IWY.

IWY tracks large-cap U.S. maturation names with a pronounced exertion focus—66% of assets—alongside 11% successful user cyclicals and 7% successful healthcare. With conscionable 110 holdings, the money is much concentrated than astir wide maturation peers. Top positions see Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA) astatine 13.88%, Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) astatine 12.12%, and Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT) astatine 11.41%. IWY has a money property of 16.3 years, offering a agelong way grounds for investors to evaluate.

VONG, successful contrast, provides broader diversification with 394 holdings and a somewhat much balanced assemblage allocation: 53% technology, 13% user cyclicals, and 13% connection services. Its apical holdings—NVIDIA Corp, Apple Inc, and Microsoft Corp—are similar, but each represents a smaller stock of assets, limiting single-stock attraction risk. Neither money introduces leverage, currency hedging, oregon different structural quirks.

For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.